Research Roundup: Readmission Risks After Surgery; Assessing Medicaid Applicants’ Eligibility; Satisfaction Among Health Plan Types


The National Health Service Norfolk and Norwic...

The National Health Service Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital in the UK, showing the utilitarian architecture of many modern hospitals. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Topics: Aging, Delivery of Care, Health Costs, Hospitals, Supreme Court, Medicaid, Public Health, Quality, Health Reform, Insurance

Aug 31, 2012

Each week KHN reporter Ankita Rao compiles a selection of recently released health policy studies and briefs.

Journal Of the American College Of Surgeons:  General Surgeons Identify Postoperative Complications Posing Strongest Readmission Risks — Researchers found that about 11 percent of patients in a study of 1,442 individuals who underwent general surgery were readmitted to the hospital within 30 days. Readmissions have become one way that the quality of care is being measured: 19.5 percent of all Medicare beneficiaries between 2003 and 2004 were readmitted within 30 days, leading to a cost of $17.4 billion. The report found several reasons for a patient’s return to the hospital, most commonly gastrointestinal problems, surgical infection and the failure to thrive or malnutrition. The results also varied depending on the procedure. The researchers urge hospital officials to hold down readmissions by taking “appropriate steps to minimize postoperative complications” (Kassin, et al, Sept. /2012).

Government Accountability Office: Information Obtained By States About Applicants’ Assets Varies And May Be Insufficient — The Government Accountability Office last year surveyed state and federal Medicaid officials to determine whether states were following the requirements for determining the Medicaid eligibility for long-term care benefits to make sure individuals do not artificially impoverish themselves for eligibility or hide assets. The federal-state program for low-income individuals pays about half of the yearly $263 billion in long-term care costs. The agency found that states varied in their approach and success. Researchers also said that all 50 states and the District of Columbia obtained at least some asset information, but none implemented an electronic Asset Verification System (AVS) that would allow them to contact multiple financial institutions to verify applicants’ information (Yocom, et al,  July/2012).

Employee Benefit Research Institute: Satisfaction With Health Coverage And Care: Findings From The 2011 EBRI/MGA Consumer Engagement In Health Care Survey — Researchers conducted a survey each year since 2005 of employees enrolled in one of three different types of health care plans: a consumer-driven health plan (those that have deductibles of at least $1,000 for an individual or $2,000 for a family and some type of health savings account to help pay for their medical expenses), a high-deductible health plan (which features the same types of deductibles but doesn’t have the health savings account) and traditional coverage. They found that survey participants in traditional plans and the consumer driven plans rated the quality of their care similarly in 2011, but ratings for high-deductible plans were lower. There was a significant difference in satisfaction with the health plan, with 57 percent of traditional plan enrollees extremely or very satisfied with their overall health plan in 2011, as compared to 37 percent of those with the high deductible plans and 46 percent of those in consumer-driven plans. The report said out-of-pocket costs played a larger role in consumer satisfaction than the quality of care or access to care (Fronstin, 8/2012).

The Kaiser Family Foundation: Implementing The ACA’s Medicaid-Related Health Reform Provisions After The Supreme Court’s Decision — This issue brief examines 10 questions that states may have followiong the Supreme Court decision last June on the federal health care law. The court ruled that the law could not force states to expand their Medicaid programs. Among those questions are: “what parts of the ACA are affected by the decision, whether states can opt in and out of the Medicaid expansion over time, whether federal payments to hospitals for uncompensated care will still be reduced if a state does not expand its Medicaid program, and whether the Court decision affects the ACA’s maintenance of effort provisions” (Musumeci, 8/28). A companion brief looks at the court’s decision.

The Commonwealth Fund: Choosing the Best Plan In A Health Insurance Exchange: Actuarial Value Tells Only Part Of The Story — In 2014, up to 23 million Americans will be able to compare health insurance plans through exchanges, or health insurance marketplaces, set up by the states under the 2010 health law. In this issue brief, researchers set out to identify consumers’ out-of-pocket costs based on their plan’s actuarial value, “the percentage of health care costs that a plan would pay for a standard population.” After analyzing 20 plans, they estimated the spending, premiums and affordability by income and age. The researchers conclude that out-of-pocket expenses usually decrease when actuarial value increases, though not consistently. The benefits of each plan also depend on an enrollee’s office visits and prescriptions, among other factors. Older people will have up to three times higher health care expenses than young adults.  However, researchers said the health law will “greatly expand consumer protections” and has the ability to give consumers the necessary information to make an educated decision (Lore, et al, 8/2012).

Here is a selection of excerpts from news coverage of other recent research:

Reuters: Midwives, Nurses Can Safely Perform Abortions
Abortions are just as safe when performed by trained nurse practitioners, midwives and physician assistants as when doctors do them, a new review of the evidence suggests. Researchers analyzed five studies that compared first-trimester abortion complications and side effects based on who performed the procedures in close to 9,000 women – and typically found no differences (Pittman, 8/30).

Medpage: Too Early To Make A Call On CKD Screening
Screening for chronic kidney disease (CKD) has insufficient evidence to assess its routine use in asymptomatic patients, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) concluded after reviewing available data. Acknowledging undiagnosed early-stage CKD as a common occurrence, the task force found no evidence that routine screening for it improves outcomes. Members of the USPSTF panel also found no generally accepted tool for assessing the risk of CKD or its complications (Bankhead, 8/28).

Medscape Today: Fitness In Middle Age Lowers Risk For Future Chronic Disease
Staying fit during middle age is associated with a decreased risk of developing chronic diseases, such as diabetes, Alzheimer’s disease, and heart disease, during the next several years, a new study suggests. Benjamin L. Willis, MD, MPH, from the Cooper Institute at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas, and colleagues, reported the findings in an article published online August 27 in the Archives of Internal Medicine (Hitt, 8/28).

Reuters: Hormone Therapy Use Among Women Continues To Drop
Years after a large study on hormone replacement therapy revealed health risks among older women using it to prevent chronic disease, the number of women who take hormones continues to decline, according to a new study. The researchers found that in 2009 and 2010, less than five percent of women over age 40, who had already gone through menopause, use either estrogen alone or estrogen and progestin. That compared to about 22 percent in 1999 and 2000 (Grens, 8/30).

Medscape: Well-Baby Dental Checks By Physicians Cut Hospitalizations
Children are less likely to be hospitalized for tooth decay when pediatricians are enlisted to perform dental care during well-baby visits, according to results from a study published online August 27 in the Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine. … Sally C. Stearns, PhD, professor, Department of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and colleagues show that infants with 4 or more physician-conducted oral health exams by age 3 years saw a small but statistically significant reduction in hospitalizations for dental caries by their sixth birthday (Laidman, 8/28).

Reuters: Routine Screening Catches Child Abuse In ER
Routinely screening all children seen in the ER for signs of maltreatment seems to have improved child abuse detection in the Netherlands, a new study finds. The progress suggests that such systematic screening helps catch more cases of child abuse, researchers report in the journal Pediatrics (Norton, 8/28).

This is part of Kaiser Health News’ Daily Report – a summary of health policy coverage from more than 300 news organizations. The full summary of the day’s news can be found here and you can sign up for e-mail subscriptions to the Daily Report here. In addition, our staff of reporters and correspondents file original stories each day, which you can find on our home page.

Denver Health: Low Readmission Rate Not Easy To Emulate


By Eric Whitney, Colorado Public Radio

August 16th, 2012, 6:12 AM

undefined

If Denver Health can do it, every hospital ought to be able to do it.

That’s the implicit challenge of the new Medicare penalties for high hospital readmission rates that will be hitting 2,211 American hospitals come October. Denver Health, despite being a safety net hospital, won’t be paying a penalty: It has an enviably low readmission rate.

But there’s a problem says Medicare’s poster child: Denver Health’s quality chief calls the new policy imprecise and perhaps unfair, too.

“The Affordable Care Act has put a ton of pressure on hospitals to focus on this, and my fear is that that is being done at the expense of other quality improvement and safety initiatives,” said Dr. Thomas MacKenzie of Denver Health. “It’s important that we have some incentive in place to try to reduce readmissions; I’m not sure that having a penalty for readmission rates is the way to go.”

Medicare says two out of three hospitals it evaluated failed to meet its new standards for preventing readmissions within 30 days of discharge. The Affordable Care Act now cuts Medicare reimbursements by up to 1 percent for those with the worst readmission rates, ratcheting up to 3 percent in 2014.

Some safety net hospitals call the penalties unfair, because the low-income patients they serve often lack access to follow-up care and medications after discharge. Medicare has pointed to Denver Health, saying it should serve as a model for other safety net hospitals.

But MacKenzie notes that there are a number of aspects at Denver Health that are hard to replicate everywhere. Denver Health, Colorado’s biggest safety net system, includes a 477-bed hospital and eight community primary care clinics. About a third of its patients are uninsured, another third are on Medicaid. The integrated system and low reimbursement rates create both a financial incentive and an opportunity to provide as much care as possible in the lower cost outpatient settings.

“We also are a hospital that is often at full capacity,” MacKenzie says, “so we certainly have an incentive when we’re busting at the seams…to make sure patients aren’t readmitted unnecessarily.”

Denver Health was also an early adopter of electronic medical records. MacKenzie says easy sharing of patient information between the hospital and clinics effectively keeps admissions down. It also helps those recently discharged get priority in scheduling follow-up appointments, putting them at the head of what can be long wait lists at community clinics.

But proud as he is of Denver Health’s low 30-day readmission rate, he’s not sure penalizing hospitals with higher rates is the best path to quality improvements that lead to lower rates.

“It’s a bit of a leap to say that one hospital’s readmission rate being different from another reflects a difference in quality and care,” he said. “Only a proportion of [readmissions] within 30-days are preventable. We think probably a quarter of them are preventable, at most.”

MacKenzie thinks hospitals should only be held responsible for readmissions within three days to a week of discharge. Readmissions after that period, he says, are either more the patient’s responsibility, or medically necessary for reasons beyond the hospital’s control.

“It may be that [hospitals with higher 30-day readmission rates] are providing better quality care, and they’re keeping their heart failure patients that would’ve died at other hospitals alive, and therefore eligible for readmission,” he said.

This story is part of a collaboration that includes Colorado Public RadioNPR and Kaiser Health News.

This entry was posted on Thursday, August 16th, 2012 at 6:12 am.

3 Responses to “Denver Health: Low Readmission Rate Not Easy To Emulate”

  1. sam says:

    “The Affordable Care Act has put a ton of pressure on hospitals to focus on this, and my fear is that that is being done at the expense of other quality improvement and safety initiatives,” said Dr. Thomas MacKenzie of Denver Health. “It’s important that we have some incentive in place to try to reduce readmissions; I’m not sure that having a penalty for readmission rates is the way to go.”

    This is BS! Hospitals need to stop whining. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) was written with their help! Remember? The main idea of the ACA is not to penalize anyone. The main idea is to to improve quality and keep people healthy and out of the hospital. If you would take the time to remember how the ACA bill was drafted, hospitals all across America agreed to penalties if they didn’t meet readmission standards. Remember? Huh? What hospital administrators (at least in this article) don’t seem to remember about what the agreement is, the temporary pain that they experience today will be far outweighed by their future experience of a patient population where virtually nobody would be without health insurance. A Romneycare population! A future like it is under Romneycare in Massachusetts where everyone coming through the front door will have good comprehensive health insurance. If Republicans would simply allow the ACA to unfold and stop their insane efforts to repeal it, hospitals will begin to see much better profit margins beginning in 2014 when the (Supreme Court approved) individual mandate kicks in. If hospitals have an enemy, it’s not the ACA. The true enemy of hospitals is the Republican Party and their efforts to disrupt the deal that the industry cut with Congress back in 2010. The real enemy of hospitals is anyone who wants to repeal this agreement by repealing the ACA.

  2. Harry says:

    Sam is right. The hospital lobby hammered out a deal with Congress back in 2010 where they would experience temporary pains in exchange for for long term permanent gains. If Obamacare is allowed to roll out, it will look like Romneycare. Under Romneycare, virtually everyone treated in the hospital has quality health insurance. Charity hospital care is virtually nonexistent in Massachusetts. Hospitals all across America want the Massachusetts experience. The hospital lobby saw those great long term benefits and agreed to the deal. Why are they complaining?

  3. KaK says:

    Dr.MacKenzie is a bit disingenuous by claiming that readmission rates do not reflect differences in care quality. I wish those reporting this story would add one criteria utilized for determining the penalty: a risk-adjusted rate. That is, hospitals are compared to only hospitals with similar patients. As far as the political commentary, hospitals are no different compared to other businesses–or individuals (including me!)–by demanding money from the government but resenting any accountability for how the money is used. Should we expect better from them? Maybe …

    English: Depiction of the House vote on H.R. 3...

    English: Depiction of the House vote on H.R. 3590 (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) on March 21, 2010, by congressional district. Democratic yea Democratic nay Republican nay No representative seated (Photo credit: Wikipedia)