Competition Key Ingredient To Success Of State Health Exchanges


Stateline reports that even some of the strongest health exchange
enthusiasts are concerned that some states will still only have limited
insurance choices for consumers. Meanwhile, in other news, the Arkansas
Medicaid expansion model gains momentum, Florida’s efforts face
continued complications, Arizona’s expansion standoff continues and the
Missouri Senate rejects the concept. Also, the shape of Ohio’s
compromise exchange is beginning to emerge.

Stateline: Lack Of Competition Might Hamper Health Exchange

The White House sums up the central idea behind the health care
exchanges in the new federal health law with a simple motto: “more
choices, greater competition.” But even some stalwart supporters of the
Affordable Care Act worry that in many states, people won’t have a lot
of health insurance choices when the exchanges launch in October. Health
economists predict that in states that already have robust competition
among insurance companies—states such as Colorado, Minnesota and
Oregon—the exchanges are likely to stimulate more. But according to
Linda Blumberg of the Urban Institute, “There are still going to be
states with virtual monopolies” (Vestal, 4/23).

Health News Florida: ‘Private Option‘ Plan, Florida Model, Passes In Ark.

Arkansas’ state legislature passed a model plan to expand Medicaid last
week, even though its Legislature is dominated by Republicans and the
measure had to pass by a three-quarters vote, the Associated Press
reports. The Arkansas plan is the model for Florida state Sen. Joe
Negron’s plan, which would accept an estimated $51 billion in federal
funds over 10 years to expand insurance to about 1 million of the
state’s low-income uninsured (Gentry, 4/22).

Miami Herald: Legislators Poised To Adjourn With No Medicaid Plan

As the clock winds down on the legislative session, Florida lawmakers
are sending signals that they are likely to adjourn without resolving
the issue of whether to accept federal Medicaid money to insure the
state’s poorest residents. “It’s not something you put together in a
week,”’ said Sen. John Thrasher, R-St. Augustine, chairman of the Senate
Rules Committee and a close adviser to Senate President Don Gaetz.
“It’s a very big, complicated issue and these issues take some time.” He
said he does not expect there would be political repercussions if the
Republican-led Legislature waits another year (Klash, 4/22).

Arizona Republic: Brewer, GOP In Medicaid Standoff

Three months after she stunned political observers and made her case for
expanding Medicaid coverage in Arizona, Gov. Jan Brewer is no closer to
reaching agreement with Republican legislative leaders on the issue,
which has driven a wedge through GOP ranks and is delaying work on the
state budget. By most accounts at the Capitol, Brewer has just enough
votes in the House and Senate to get expansion approved. Even some
lawmakers who oppose the plan predict it eventually will pass, owing in
large part to the power of the governor’s veto pen and her reputation
for tenacity, as well as pressure from top-flight lobbyists and
heart-tugging health-care crisis stories (Reinhart, 4/22).

The Associated Press: Mo. Senate Votes Down Federal Medicaid Expansion

Republican senators have made it clear that there will be no Medicaid
expansion in Missouri this session. The Republican-led Senate voted down
a Democratic attempt Monday night to insert $890 million of federal
funds into Missouri’s budget to expand Medicaid eligibility to an
estimated 260,000 lower-income adults (4/23).

Cleveland Plain Dealer: Ohio’s Medicaid Expansion Alternative Could Use Private Insurance

For the first time since Gov. John Kasich won national attention by
supporting Medicaid expansion, a clear picture is emerging on how the
Republican governor’s compromise with federal regulators could work.
Some uninsured Ohioans would be enrolled in the state’s traditional
Medicaid program, while others would sign up for private health
insurance using federal funding, said Greg Moody, director of Ohio’s
Office of Health Transformation. The proposal, which Kasich hopes to
sell to GOP lawmakers reluctant to support an outright Medicaid
expansion, has been dubbed “The Ohio Plan.” And it differs from the
standard federal expansion program on one crucial point: It puts some
enrollees in the private insurance market (Tribble, 4/22).

This is part of Kaiser Health News‘ Daily Report – a summary
of health policy coverage from more than 300 news organizations. The
full summary of the day’s news can be found here and you can sign up for e-mail subscriptions to the Daily Report here. In addition, our staff of reporters and correspondents file original stories each day, which you can find on our home page.

John Kasich

John Kasich (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Insurer Centene: We Can Do Arkansas-Style Medicaid


English: House Bill and Senate Bill subsidies ...

English: House Bill and Senate Bill subsidies for health insurance premiums. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

By Jay Hancock

April 23rd, 2013, 3:33 PM

Arkansas
is the latest and perhaps best hope for those who want states resistant
to the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion to reconsider.

Illustration by Darwinek via Wikimedia Commons

Last week the Arkansas legislature approved
a plan to give Medicaid beneficiaries money to buy individual policies
from private insurers on the state’s health insurance exchange — the
subsidized, online markeplaces due to be in business next year. The
governor signed the bill Tuesday — making it law.

The Department of Health and Human Services, which has said it “will consider approving a limited number” of such arrangements, still needs to negotiate details and sign off.

One insurer is already expressing interest.

“We
are very capable of doing an Arkansas-type model,” Centene Corp. CEO
Michael Neidorff said Tuesday. “That’s something that would be a sweet
spot for us.”

Centene sees opportunity in participating in the
health law’s coverage expansions, whether Arkansas-style or not. It
already runs Medicaid managed care plans for those with very low incomes
in several states, although not in Arkansas. Now it wants to offer
plans to individuals with slightly higher incomes through the exchanges.

“We
believe we can achieve increased profitability in 2014 upon the
commencement of the ACA,” Neidorff told stock analysts Tuesday. “The
exchange market represents the largest growth opportunity for Centene
over the next several years, estimated at $52 billion in our existing
markets.”

Policy analysts expect considerable “churn”
from members moving between the ACA’s expanded Medicaid program and
commercial policies sold on the exchanges as their incomes fluctuate.
Centene wants to be on both sides of the line, selling “a product that
offers people a comfortable transition,” said K. Rone Baldwin, chief of
the company’s insurance group.

Whether managed by Centene or some
other carrier, private, individual insurance in the Arkansas mode could
help Medicaid members keep the same doctor and otherwise minimize
disruptions when they graduate to a non-Medicaid exchange plan, some
have suggested.

The Arkansas model faces large questions. Not least are those about cost.
Commercial insurance of the type Arkansas sees covering Medicaid
members typically pays doctors and hospitals more than traditional
Medicaid or Medicaid managed care plans like Centene runs.

But the plan is being praised as a “conservative alternative” to Obamacare classic and is reportedly being eyed by Pennsylvania, Ohio and other states resisting the Medicaid expansion.

Centene
executives spoke to investment analysts on a conference call about the
company’s quarterly profits. Like other insurers, they were coy about
saying where they plan to offer exchange plans and on what terms.

“We
do expect to be on the exchanges in a subset of the places where we
have health plans today, and we’re entering into contracts with
hospitals,” said Baldwin. How well will Centene be paying those
hospitals to care for its exchange members? “It’s certainly not exactly
at [lower] Medicaid rates but I wouldn’t say it’s exactly at [higher]
commercial rates either,” he added.

The company earned $23 million for the quarter on revenue of $2.5 billion.

Viewpoints: ‘Big Risks’ Of Buying Private Insurance With Medicaid Dollars; One Month Of Sequestration


US residents with employer-based private healt...

US residents with employer-based private health insurance, with self insurance, with Medicare or Medicaid or military health care and uninsured in Million; U.S. Census bureau: Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2007 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Topics: Medicaid, Medicare, Health Reform, States, Health Costs, Women’s Health, Uninsured

Apr 01, 2013

The New York Times: Using Medicaid Dollars For Private Insurance
The Obama administration and Republican officials in several states are exploring ways to redirect federal money intended to expand Medicaid, the main public insurance program for the poor, and use it instead to buy private health insurance for Medicaid recipients. The approach could have important benefits for beneficiaries and for the future of health care reform. But the idea also carries big risks. Federal officials will need to enforce strict conditions before agreeing to any redirection of Medicaid dollars that were originally intended to enlarge the Medicaid rolls (3/31).

Forbes: The Arkansas-Obamacare Medicaid Deal: Far Less Than It First Appeared
When Arkansas Gov. Mike Beebe (D.) first announced that he had reached a deal with the Obama administration to use the Affordable Care Act‘s private insurance exchanges to expand coverage to poor Arkansans, it seemed like an important, and potentially transformative, development. … A Good Friday memo from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, however, splashes cold water on that aspiration. It’s now clear that the Beebe-HHS deal applies a kind of private-sector window dressing on the dysfunctional Medicaid program, and it’s not obvious that the Arkansas legislature should go along (Avik Roy, 4/1).

USA Today: ‘Sequester’ Still Looks Stupid, As Planned: Our View
Congress and the White House exempted some programs when they finalized the original deal, and the spending bill they agreed to last month to keep the government open to Sept. 30 spared some vital functions — food inspections, for example. But not enough. Nor does the sequester seriously address the major spending driver: health care costs. The best outcome would be for the sort of anger that forced Congress and the White House to re-open the government in 1996 to push Congress and the White House back to the table on a realistic budget deal this year. The outlines of that deal have been obvious for too long: Trim entitlement programs such as Medicare and Social Security, overhaul the hopelessly inefficient and corrupt tax code to bring in more money, and cut defense and domestic programs with a scalpel instead of an ax (3/31).

USA Today: ‘Sequester’ Needed To Rein In Spending: Another View
Let’s get real on the “sequester.” One month in, not much has changed. Nor is it likely to. Rather than devastating the federal government, the sequester is necessary to rein in the unbridled growth of federal spending. The sequester is certainly flawed. It’s a blunt instrument leaving the biggest spending drivers, entitlements, virtually untouched (Alison Fraser, 3/31).

The Wall Street Journal: The Liberal Medicare Advantage Revolt
A big political story this year is likely to be Democrats turning on their White House minders as the harmful and unpopular parts of the Affordable Care Act ramp up. On the heels of the recent 79-20 Senate uprising against the 2.3% medical device tax, now comes the surge of Democrats pleading on behalf of Medicare Advantage. Liberals have claimed for years to hate this program, but by now Advantage provides private insurance coverage to more than one of four seniors. And those seniors like it (3/29).

The Chicago Tribune: Scrubbing Medicaid
In January, Illinois launched an effort to scrub ineligible people from the state’s Medicaid rolls. … The initial results of this audit are … astonishing: Of the first 20,500 recipients screened by an outside contractor, the auditors recommend that 13,709 be removed from the rolls. Yes, that’s two-thirds of the first group screened, flagged as ineligible to receive their current Medicaid benefits. How so? In some cases, the recipients make too much money to qualify. In other cases, they don’t live in Illinois (3/31).

The New York Times: The Campaign to Outlaw Abortion
Anti-abortion groups have been trying to re-impose restrictions on abortion rights for 40 years, but the Legislature and governor of North Dakota have taken this attack on women’s reproductive health and freedom to a shocking new low … The clear message is the need for a stepped-up effort to hold state officials electorally accountable for policies that harm women in states where right-wing Republicans control the machinery of government (3/29).

The Seattle Times: State Senate Health Care Committee Should Vote On Abortion Measure
After the Senate Health Care Committee hearing on the Reproductive Parity Act Monday, members should vote for it before a key deadline Wednesday. State lawmakers do not need to complicate this issue. House Bill 1044 would maintain insurance coverage for women seeking abortions after federal health reforms take effect (3/31).

Los Angeles Times: The Starbucks Syndrome In Healthcare
Medicare statistics, for example, reveal that Los Angeles leads the nation in the amount of medical services provided during the last six months of a person’s life. Healthy seniors here are also big consumers of healthcare, getting about 65% more MRI studies and utilizing ambulances three times as often as seniors elsewhere. Commercial insurance data point to similar patterns in the healthcare of the younger population in Southern California. What explains such avid use of medical services. … Part of the problem is that Angelenos approach healthcare as they do other kinds of consumption. They expect their CT scans, when they want them, in much the same way they expect their decaf caramel extra hot low-fat macchiatos. (Daniel J. Stone, 3/31).

Los Angeles Times: Bump In The Road For Healthcare Law
One figure in a new report neatly summarizes the potential pitfalls for Obamacare: 30.1%. That’s how much premiums could rise next year, on average, for the roughly 1.3 million moderate- and upper-income Californians who buy individual health insurance policies. Most of that increase is attributable to the insurance reforms in the 2010 law, also known as the Affordable Care Act. The bill’s title is not ironic — its provisions will slow the growth of healthcare costs and lead over time to a more rational and efficient system. But the transition will have some rough patches, and we’re about to hit one (3/29).

Houston Chronicle: The Affordable Care Act Is A Poor Solution
Senator Orrin Hatch has speculated that the Affordable Care Act was designed to fail. A close look at the Act’s contents and history suggests he may be right. The Affordable Care Act is nothing more than a political stopgap, a waypoint on the road to something that might work. Republicans could stand around complaining or we could seize this opportunity to determine what comes next (Chris Ladd, 4/1).

Richmond Times-Dispatch: Moving Forward On Medicaid: More Important Than Ever
As a community physician for more than eight years, I’ve seen how medical care helps keep families strong and secure. When parents and their kids can access health care — and have a way to pay for it — they are much less likely to face unpaid bills or have to put off doctor visits. Instead of worrying about how their family is going to survive, they can focus on how their family is going to thrive. Unfortunately, too many Virginians — more than a million, in fact — find that getting health care is a real challenge because they don’t have insurance (Dr. Christopher Lillis, 4/1).

The Wall Street Journal: The Skinny On Anti-Obesity Soda Laws
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s anti-obesity campaign to ban the sale of certain sugary drinks in large servings, especially sodas, was struck down last month in state court. A proposal for a penny-per-ounce excise tax on sweetened beverages also floundered in Vermont’s House of Representatives in February. … As an economist, I have two big gripes with such paternalistic public-health initiatives: The proposals aren’t grounded in data or compelling economic models, and soda taxes might catalyze a dismal chain reaction, with escalating government intrusions on personal freedom (Michael L. Marlow, 3/31).

Oregonian: Don’t Take Portland’s Sick-Leave Mistake Statewide: Agenda 2013
By voting to mandate paid sick leave last month, Amanda Fritz and her city council colleagues furthered Portland’s reputation as a place where businesses fear to tread. One way to protect city employers burdened by this mandate is to adopt a similar requirement statewide, erasing a competitive advantage a restaurant in, say, Beaverton might have over one in Portland. In other words, bail out Portland by making things tougher all over (3/31).

USA Today: ER Key To Curb Painkiller Abuse
Most opioids are prescribed in the doctor’s office, which has prompted some states to restrict primary care physicians like myself from prescribing them and to encourage referrals to pain specialists. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg has taken these curbs a step further by focusing on emergency departments. In January, he announced a voluntary initiative to limit prescription of opioid painkillers in the emergency rooms of the city’s 11 public hospitals. This approach should be expanded across the nation. From 2004 to 2009, the number of emergency visits in New York City hospitals related to opioid abuse or misuse more than doubled (Dr. Kevin Pho, 3/31).

This is part of Kaiser Health News’ Daily Report – a summary of health policy coverage from more than 300 news organizations. The full summary of the day’s news can be found here and you can sign up for e-mail subscriptions to the Daily Report here. In addition, our staff of reporters and correspondents file original stories each day, which you can find on our home page.

Roundup: D.C. Sued Over Medicaid Reimbursement; Vt. To Post Health Care Rates


English: Depiction of the House vote on H.R. 3...

English: Depiction of the House vote on H.R. 3590 (the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) on March 21, 2010, by congressional district. Democratic yea Democratic nay Republican nay No representative seated (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Topics: States, Medicaid, Politics, Health Reform, Insurance, Marketplace, Hospitals, Health Costs, Delivery of Care, Public Health

Apr 01, 2013

The Washington Post: Specialty Hospital Centers Sue D.C. For Reimbursement Of Medicaid Costs
Two facilities that treat severely ill poor patients could be forced to curtail services if the District does not fully reimburse them for Medicaid costs, according to a lawsuit filed this week. In the suit, Specialty Hospital of Washington Capitol Hill and Specialty Hospital of Washington Hadley claim the city has failed to reimburse them $24.7 million over the past four years (Craig, 3/29).

The Texas Tribune/New York Times: Texas Senate Bill Would Revise the State’s End-of-Life Procedure
Texas lawmakers have grappled year after year over whether families or medical professionals should decide when to end a terminally ill patient’s life-sustaining care. This year, they seem closer to a compromise (Aaronson, 3/30).

The Associated Press: Vt. To Be First State To Post Health Care Rates
Vermont is poised to become the first state in the country to let people without health insurance see how much they will have to pay to get coverage through the federal Affordable Care Act next year. On Monday, the state is going to post the proposed rates to be offered through the state’s health insurance marketplace for various levels of coverage (Ring, 4/1).

Richmond Times-Dispatch: Your Health: Virginia Graded “B” On Health Price Transparency
A recent report gave Virginia a grade of B on health care price transparency. What does that mean? The report graded states on whether consumers had access to public information that would allow them to compare prices of health care services. States’ grades were based on whether there were state laws or policies requiring price information to be made available to consumers upon request or disseminated in a report or posted to a public website (4/1).

MPR News: ‘Urgency Center’ Clinic To Open In Blaine
A new facility opening soon in Blaine (Minnesota) will serve people with medical conditions that are not serious enough for an emergency room but still require care unavailable in most medical clinics. The new facility, called an urgency center, will open in partnership with a clinic in Blaine, said Dr. Amy Kolar, the director of the emergency room at North Memorial Hospital, which is opening the center. The urgency center will be ideal for people who break a bone or dislocate a shoulder but do not need to be admitted to a hospital, Kolar said (Williams, 3/31).

MPR News: $50K Grant Targets Overused Medical Tests
The Minnesota Medical Association, the state’s largest doctor group, has received a $50,000 grant to educate physicians and patients about overused medical tests and procedures. The grant, funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, is one of nearly two dozen awarded to health organizations around the United States. The medical association’s CEO, Dr. Robert Meiches, said that the initiative, called Choosing Wisely, encourages doctors and patients to select care that is supported by evidence; does not duplicate previous tests; and is free from harm (Stawicki, 3/30).

The Associated Press: Gov. Fallin Releases Health Care Documents, Withholds Others
Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin’s office refused Friday to release dozens of documents surrounding decisions she made connected to the federal health care law, citing exemptions to the state’s Open Records Act that media experts say do not exist. In response to a request from several media outlets, including The Associated Press, the governor’s office released in digital form more than 50,000 pages of documents relating to the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (3/30).

EdSource: Schools Struggle To Provide Dental Health Safety Net
As California educators grapple with boosting student achievement across economic lines, the teeth of poor children are holding them back. Hundreds of thousands of low-income children suffering from dental disease, some with teeth rotted to the gum line, are presenting California school districts with a widespread public health problem. Increasingly, dental health advocates are looking to school districts to help solve the crisis (Adams, 3/31).

HealthyCal: School Clinics Put Emphasis On Wellness
Just in time for the advent of national health care reform next year, Los Angeles-area schools are opening their first campus-based wellness centers, offering services not just to students and their families, but to entire neighborhoods. On a recent day in Compton, the Dominguez High School Marching Band played and drill team dancers whirled and pranced to celebrate the opening of their new center (Richard, 4/1).

California Healthline: New Survey Offers First Data On Managed Care Shift
A survey released yesterday revealed strengths and weaknesses in the state’s 2011 transition of about 172,000 seniors and persons with disabilities into Medi-Cal managed care plans. Two-thirds of the responding beneficiaries said their care was the same or better than it had been before the transition but the survey raised concerns on several fronts, most notably a lower level of notification and communication, according to Carrie Graham, assistant director of research at Health Research for Action at UC-Berkeley School of Public Health. Health Research for Action conducted the survey in partnership with the California HealthCare Foundation, which publishes California Healthline (Gorn, 3/29).

This is part of Kaiser Health News’ Daily Report – a summary of health policy coverage from more than 300 news organizations. The full summary of the day’s news can be found here and you can sign up for e-mail subscriptions to the Daily Report here. In addition, our staff of reporters and correspondents file original stories each day, which you can find on our home page.

Years After Law, Kennedy Continues Mental Health Coverage Parity Battle


English: Centre for Mental Health logo

English: Centre for Mental Health logo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Topics: Politics, Mental Health, Insurance, Delivery of Care, States

Apr 01, 2013

A mental health parity law passed in 2008, yet one of the measure’s key backers — former Congressman Patrick Kennedy — continues the fight for equal coverage of mental illness. He is meeting mixed success.WBUR: CommonHealth: Kennedy Calling For Equal Coverage Of Mental Health — Yes, Still
Mental health “parity” is officially a done deal. Congress passed a law back in 2008 requiring health insurers to treat mental health on a par with physical health, covering care for mental illness and addiction no less than they cover physical care. Many states have also passed their own mental health parity laws. So why has former Congressman Patrick Kennedy of Rhode Island — lead sponsor of the 2008 bill together with his late father, Sen. Ted Kennedy — spent much of the last couple of years criss-crossing the country to advocate for mental health parity? (3/29).

In Texas, mental health funding faces a tough road ahead after budget gaps appear —

The Associated Press: Texas Mental Health Funding Leaves Gaps
Standing in a courtyard by the state Capitol, Sen. Judith Zaffirini reached out to touch the Mental Health Bell, forged in the 1950s from chains once used to shackle asylum patients, brought to Texas this year on display as a 300-pound symbol of hope. … But while advocates for the mentally ill roundly cheer their gains, it is becoming clear the money will go only so far. Lawmakers are scrambling to repair a patchwork system spread among community centers, state agencies and all levels of the criminal justice system (Brick, 3/30).

This is part of Kaiser Health News‘ Daily Report – a summary of health policy coverage from more than 300 news organizations. The full summary of the day’s news can be found here and you can sign up for e-mail subscriptions to the Daily Report here. In addition, our staff of reporters and correspondents file original stories each day, which you can find on our home page.

Louisiana Health Secretary Submits Resignation


, member of the United States House of Represe...

, member of the United States House of Representatives. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Topics: States, Medicaid, Politics

Apr 01, 2013

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal‘s health secretary — Bruce Greenstein — is resigning amid a probe into a Medicaid contract he awarded to a former employer.

The Associated Press: La. Gov. Jindal’s Health Secretary Resigns As Probes Continue Into Medicaid Contract
Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal’s health secretary and close ally, Bruce Greenstein, is resigning amid ongoing state and federal investigations into the awarding of a Medicaid contract to a company where Greenstein once worked, officials said Friday. The Jindal administration canceled the nearly $200 million contract with Maryland-based CNSI last week after details leaked of a federal grand jury subpoena involving the contract award (3/29).

New Orleans Times Picayune: DHH Secretary Bruce Greenstein Resigns In Wake Of Federal Investigation
Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals Secretary Bruce Greenstein has resigned, a statement from Gov. Bobby Jindal’s office confirmed Friday. Speculation Greenstein would resign was rampant after news broke he allegedly used his influence as department head to secure a contract for a former employer. … Asked whether the hospitals secretary was forced out, Jindal spokesman Sean Lansing said in an email, “The governor did not ask Bruce to resign.” He later added that no one in the administration or among Jindal’s advisers asked Greenstein to resign (McGaughy, 3/29).

This is part of Kaiser Health News‘ Daily Report – a summary of health policy coverage from more than 300 news organizations. The full summary of the day’s news can be found here and you can sign up for e-mail subscriptions to the Daily Report here. In addition, our staff of reporters and correspondents file original stories each day, which you can find on our home page.

As Hyperactivity Diagnoses Rise, Concerns Grow About Overmedication Of Children


Topics: Public Health, Quality, Health Disparities

Apr 01, 2013

New CDC data shows that nearly one in five boys have a medical diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Other public health issues highlighted by news outlets include stroke risks in younger people, prescription-drug deaths and OSHA policies.

The New York Times: More Diagnoses Of Hyperactivity In New C.D.C. Data
Nearly one in five high school age boys in the United States and 11 percent of school-age children over all have received a medical diagnosis of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, according to new data from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. These rates reflect a marked rise over the last decade and could fuel growing concern among many doctors that the A.D.H.D. diagnosis and its medication are overused in American children (Schwarz and Cohen, 3/31).

NPR: As Stroke Risk Rises Among Younger Adults, So Does Early Death
Most people (including a lot of doctors) think of a stroke as something that happens to old people. But the rate is increasing among those in their 50s, 40s and even younger (Knox, 4/1).

Los Angeles Times: Prescription Drug-Related Deaths Continue To Rise In U.S.
Despite efforts by law enforcement and public health officials to curb prescription drug abuse, drug-related deaths in the United States have continued to rise, the latest data show. Figures from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reveal that drug fatalities increased 3% in 2010, the most recent year for which complete data are available. Preliminary data for 2011 indicate the trend has continued (Glover and Girion, 3/29).

The New York Times: As OSHA Emphasizes Safety, Long-Term Health Risks Fester
OSHA, the watchdog agency that many Americans love to hate and industry often faults as overzealous, has largely ignored long-term threats. Partly out of pragmatism, the agency created by President Richard M. Nixon to give greater attention to health issues has largely done the opposite. OSHA devotes most of its budget and attention to responding to here-and-now dangers rather than preventing the silent, slow killers that, in the end, take far more lives. Over the past four decades, the agency has written new standards with exposure limits for 16 of the most deadly workplace hazards, including lead, asbestos and arsenic. But for the tens of thousands of other dangerous substances American workers handle each day, employers are largely left to decide what exposure level is safe (Urbina, 3/30).

English: Percent of Youth 4-17 ever diagnosed ...

English: Percent of Youth 4-17 ever diagnosed with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: National Survey of Children’s Health, 2003 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)